I’ve been asking myself this question a lot. There are so many citties to live in, that there must be a best city to live in right? Is the best city the cheapest? Sunniest? Or largest? Of course everyone has a different opinion on the matter. While some might find the best city to be in New Zealand for its great skiing, others might prefer San Diego for its sunny weather. Whatever the case, personally preferences play a huge factor.
I’ve been to cities far and wide and can’t say I’ve ever found my own personal Shangrila. You can live in New York and have it all, but pay for it too. You can live in Mexico and pay barely anything to live, but deal with higher crime. Whenever one aspect is high, another seems to be pushed down. You can’t have everything and live cheap, or live cheap and expect to have everything.
There are exceptions to every rule. Canada has managed to produce some of the world’s safest cities and cheapest at that. Still, then you get to deal with colder winter weather. Berlin has become a fashionable, cool city, but then you have ti
Perhaps I’m being greedy. Many people don’t have the chance to choose where they want to live. Where they live is based on where their job is. Or maybe any place can be great or terrible depending on how you use your time? Some would say people make the place, get good friends and any place can be great.
